D-GA44 FUEL DISPENSER

D-GA44 FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type: Optional

Inlet Pressure : >=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.) :55±5

Suction Distance (m): 6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type: Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle : Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type: Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset : Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price: 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight : 335kg

Dimension(L×W×H): 1270 x 620 x 2420(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container: 40ft: 45 20ft: 22

ressure cover Take out spring fuel dispenser and main valve Unload top level and locking nut, pay much attention as replacing 0-ring Adjusting bolt, keeping the clearance between top level and switch handle in the scope of 0.3~~0.5mm Install spring, pressure cover and sealed gasket. Trail run, to ensure operation flexible of nozzle and each sealed face without leakage Auto-shut nozzle Auto-shut nozzle is developed from general nozzle, which has function of automatic switch off. As container is full, nozzle valve is closed automatically, kee fuel dispenser ping clean and safety of operation environment. Due to this merit, this kind of nozzle is widely adopted in many brands of fuel dispensers. This handbook will introduce the structure and working principle of general nozzle. Structure Illustrated in Diagram 2-31, auto-shut nozzle consists of nozzle body, main valve, top level, switch membrane, auto-shut level, side valve core, spout, etc. 1-Nozzle body 2-Cap 3-Ejection pin 4-O-ring 5-Spring 6-Pressure plate 7-Main valve 8-Upper cover 9-Swtich membrane 10-autoshut bar 11-Steel ball 12-Assistant valve 13-Sleeve 14-Air inlet spout 15-Air inlet pipe 16-Spring 17-Spout 18-O-ring 19-Spring 20-Assistant valve core 21-Autocontrol bar 22-Supporting plate 23-Location-limited plate 24-Switch handle Diagram 2-31: Auto-shut nozzle Main structure of auto-shut nozzle as followed: Four holes in the circle of side valve, which are connected with the upper chamber of switch membrane via the gradient hole on nozzle body; the lower chamber of switch membrane connect to outside via the clearance between nozzle body and auto-shut level. There are three steel balls installed in holes of upper of auto-shut, lift switch handle, auto-shut level is stuck in by there balls; once auto-shut level move upward, main valve will be closed as switch lost supportive point. Metal sheet is installed on switch handle, which is controlled three different positions corresponding to three kinds of openness--- thr fuel dispenser ee kinds of flow rate. The spring on spout is

002 IFSF ST fuel dispenser ANDARD FORECOURT PROTOCOL FP319_1.00　　 EPS POS INTERFACE SPECIFICATION　　Page 18 of 146　　16. Cashier gives Customer EFT Ticket Sales receipt and cash back.　　Scenario - (2) - Not successful payment by card　　1. Customer brings the items to the POS to be rung up.　　2. Cashier enters the items into the POS and requests the method of payment.　　3. POS passes sales information to EPS requesting card payment.　　1. EPS gets card data　 fuel dispenser 　4. EPS authorises card (not relevant where or how this is performed).　　 a. EPS asks for additional data　　 b. EPS performs any checkfunctionality according to cardconfigurationstatus　　 c. EPS provides the Eft Receipt to be printed.　　 d. Cashier performs any check if required　　 e. Cashier completes EFT transaction on the EPS　　5. EPS tells POS that payment was not ok.　　6. POS is still at the initial status and cashier selects another method of payment.　　Scenario - (2 - Example A) - Not successful payment by card because of customer　　abort　　1. Customer brings the items to the POS to be rung up.　　2. Cashier enters the items into the POS and requests the method of payment.　　3. POS passes sales information to EPS requesting card payment.　　4. EPS gets card data　　5. EPS authorises card (not relevant where or how this is performed).　　 a. EPS asks for additional data　　 b. EPS performs any checkfunctionality according to cardconfigurationstatus　　 c. Customer aborts on pin-padaccording on EPS functionalityconfiguration this　　 might cause a transaction abort　　 d. EPS provides the Eft Receipt to be printed.　　6. EPS tells POS that payment was not ok.　　7. POS is still at the initial status and cashier selects another method of payment.　　Scenario - (2 Example B) - Not successf fuel dispenser

l 23rd, the SEC s Advisory Commi fuel dispenser ttee on Smaller Public Companies was expected to recommend that companies be exempted from Section 404 if their market capitalisation is less than $128m and their revenues are under $125m. Firms with a market value of up to $788m, and revenues of under $250m would be partially exempted. This proposal has run into strong opposition, not least from Mr Sarbanes himself, who points out that it would “effectively exempt four out of every five companies� True, but it was failures at big firms that gave fuel dispenser rise to SOX, not at small ones, which investors have always thought riskier. In all, the exemption would cover firms accounting for only 6% of total American stock market value, leaving 94% of public companies by value still subject to Section 404. Rather than exempt companies, Section 404 should be refined to make it more palatable for all firms, argues Robert Pozen, the head of MFS, a fund-management firm. At the moment, audit companies are looking at far too many internal controls—some 669 on average at the biggest firms, according to CRA—including items such as travel expenses and the handling of petty cash that are highly unlikely to have any serious impact on a company s financial reporting. Mr Pozen reckons that the SEC has the authority to require a narrower focus on those internal controls that look at material risks to a firm s financial reports. Mr Grundfest goes further. As it stands, the PCAOB can penalise auditors that are too lax. He would like it to punish those audit firms that are over-zealous in their interpretation of Section 404, too. What could be fairer than that? © 2006 . The Enron trial The grilling of Skilling Apr 20th 2006 | HOUSTON From The Economist print edition A frustrating week for Jeffrey Skilling IS THIS the same man who once flaunted a licence plate reading WLEC, for “World s Leading Energy Company� Under cross-examination this week fuel dispenser , the once-brash Jeffrey Skilling w